Where Does Originality End and Plagiarism Start? Discussing Plagiarism in Information Science: In iConference 2014 Proceedings

Research output: Contribution to conference › Conference abstract for conference › Research › peer-review

Standard

Where Does Originality End and Plagiarism Start? Discussing Plagiarism in Information Science : In iConference 2014 Proceedings. / Greifeneder, Elke Susanne; Connaway, Lynn Silipigni; Jiang, Tingting; Seadle, Michael; Weber-Wulff, Debora; Wolfram, Dietmar.

2014.

Research output: Contribution to conference › Conference abstract for conference › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Greifeneder, ES, Connaway, LS, Jiang, T, Seadle, M, Weber-Wulff, D & Wolfram, D 2014, 'Where Does Originality End and Plagiarism Start? Discussing Plagiarism in Information Science: In iConference 2014 Proceedings'. https://doi.org/10.9776/14418

APA

Greifeneder, E. S., Connaway, L. S., Jiang, T., Seadle, M., Weber-Wulff, D., & Wolfram, D. (2014). Where Does Originality End and Plagiarism Start? Discussing Plagiarism in Information Science: In iConference 2014 Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.9776/14418

Vancouver

Greifeneder ES, Connaway LS, Jiang T, Seadle M, Weber-Wulff D, Wolfram D. Where Does Originality End and Plagiarism Start? Discussing Plagiarism in Information Science: In iConference 2014 Proceedings. 2014. https://doi.org/10.9776/14418

Author

Greifeneder, Elke Susanne ; Connaway, Lynn Silipigni ; Jiang, Tingting ; Seadle, Michael ; Weber-Wulff, Debora ; Wolfram, Dietmar. / Where Does Originality End and Plagiarism Start? Discussing Plagiarism in Information Science : In iConference 2014 Proceedings.

Bibtex

@conference{a202bf8244f54adb9784b362d679eae8,
title = "Where Does Originality End and Plagiarism Start? Discussing Plagiarism in Information Science: In iConference 2014 Proceedings",
abstract = "This paper describes a session for interaction and engagement to be held at iConference2014. The session for interaction and engagement focuses on researchers at iSchools and as such is an intellectual follow-up to the systematic check of all iConference2014 paper submissions in a copying detection system. The session offers a platform for discussing whether the use of such a system is justified for a conference that attracts submissions from highly respected researchers. Panel members and the audience will discuss the amount of text a researcher is allowed to reuse and when a submission would no longer be considered to be original and starts to be considered self-plagiarism. Parts of the discussion will center on the question of whether information science researchers can actually avoid repeating the same words when today they have to publish results from research projects in as many publications as possible.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, Plagiarism, publishing practices, plagiarism software",
author = "Greifeneder, {Elke Susanne} and Connaway, {Lynn Silipigni} and Tingting Jiang and Michael Seadle and Debora Weber-Wulff and Dietmar Wolfram",
note = "iConference 2014 Proceedings",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.9776/14418",
language = "English",

}

RIS

TY - ABST

T1 - Where Does Originality End and Plagiarism Start? Discussing Plagiarism in Information Science

T2 - In iConference 2014 Proceedings

AU - Greifeneder, Elke Susanne

AU - Connaway, Lynn Silipigni

AU - Jiang, Tingting

AU - Seadle, Michael

AU - Weber-Wulff, Debora

AU - Wolfram, Dietmar

N1 - iConference 2014 Proceedings

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This paper describes a session for interaction and engagement to be held at iConference2014. The session for interaction and engagement focuses on researchers at iSchools and as such is an intellectual follow-up to the systematic check of all iConference2014 paper submissions in a copying detection system. The session offers a platform for discussing whether the use of such a system is justified for a conference that attracts submissions from highly respected researchers. Panel members and the audience will discuss the amount of text a researcher is allowed to reuse and when a submission would no longer be considered to be original and starts to be considered self-plagiarism. Parts of the discussion will center on the question of whether information science researchers can actually avoid repeating the same words when today they have to publish results from research projects in as many publications as possible.

AB - This paper describes a session for interaction and engagement to be held at iConference2014. The session for interaction and engagement focuses on researchers at iSchools and as such is an intellectual follow-up to the systematic check of all iConference2014 paper submissions in a copying detection system. The session offers a platform for discussing whether the use of such a system is justified for a conference that attracts submissions from highly respected researchers. Panel members and the audience will discuss the amount of text a researcher is allowed to reuse and when a submission would no longer be considered to be original and starts to be considered self-plagiarism. Parts of the discussion will center on the question of whether information science researchers can actually avoid repeating the same words when today they have to publish results from research projects in as many publications as possible.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - Plagiarism

KW - publishing practices

KW - plagiarism software

U2 - 10.9776/14418

DO - 10.9776/14418

M3 - Conference abstract for conference

ER -

ID: 103054361