Rethinking European integration history in light of capitalism: the case of the long 1970s

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Rethinking European integration history in light of capitalism: the case of the long 1970s. / Andry, Aurélie; Mourlon-Druol, Emmanuel; Ikonomou, Haakon Andreas; Jouan, Quentin .

In: European Review of History, Vol. 26, No. 4, 23.07.2019, p. 553-572.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Andry, A, Mourlon-Druol, E, Ikonomou, HA & Jouan, Q 2019, 'Rethinking European integration history in light of capitalism: the case of the long 1970s', European Review of History, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 553-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2019.1610361

APA

Andry, A., Mourlon-Druol, E., Ikonomou, H. A., & Jouan, Q. (2019). Rethinking European integration history in light of capitalism: the case of the long 1970s. European Review of History, 26(4), 553-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2019.1610361

Vancouver

Andry A, Mourlon-Druol E, Ikonomou HA, Jouan Q. Rethinking European integration history in light of capitalism: the case of the long 1970s. European Review of History. 2019 Jul 23;26(4):553-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2019.1610361

Author

Andry, Aurélie ; Mourlon-Druol, Emmanuel ; Ikonomou, Haakon Andreas ; Jouan, Quentin . / Rethinking European integration history in light of capitalism: the case of the long 1970s. In: European Review of History. 2019 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 553-572.

Bibtex

@article{6aed7860ab6949ce9a5b24fe4b1ae2da,
title = "Rethinking European integration history in light of capitalism:: the case of the long 1970s",
abstract = "This introduction outlines the possibilities and perspectives of an intertwining between European integration history and the history of capitalism. Although debates on capitalism have been making a comeback since the 2008 crisis, to date the concept of capitalism remains almost completely avoided by historians of European integration. This introduction thus conceptualizes {\textquoteleft}capitalism{\textquoteright} as a useful analytical tool that should be used by historians of European integration and proposes three major approaches for them to do so: first, by bringing the question of social conflict, integral to the concept of capitalism, into European integration history; second, by better conceptualizing the link between European governance, Europeanization and the globalization of capitalism; and thirdly by investigating the economic, political and ideological models or doctrines that underlie European cooperation, integration, policies and institutions. Finally, the introduction addresses the question of the analytical benefits of an encounter between capitalism and European integration history, focusing on the case of the 1970s. This allows us to qualify the idea of a clear-cut rupture, and better highlight how the shift of these years resulted from a complex bargaining that took place in part at the European level.",
author = "Aur{\'e}lie Andry and Emmanuel Mourlon-Druol and Ikonomou, {Haakon Andreas} and Quentin Jouan",
year = "2019",
month = jul,
day = "23",
doi = "10.1080/13507486.2019.1610361",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "553--572",
journal = "European Review of History/Revue Europeenne d'Histoire",
issn = "1350-7486",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking European integration history in light of capitalism:

T2 - the case of the long 1970s

AU - Andry, Aurélie

AU - Mourlon-Druol, Emmanuel

AU - Ikonomou, Haakon Andreas

AU - Jouan, Quentin

PY - 2019/7/23

Y1 - 2019/7/23

N2 - This introduction outlines the possibilities and perspectives of an intertwining between European integration history and the history of capitalism. Although debates on capitalism have been making a comeback since the 2008 crisis, to date the concept of capitalism remains almost completely avoided by historians of European integration. This introduction thus conceptualizes ‘capitalism’ as a useful analytical tool that should be used by historians of European integration and proposes three major approaches for them to do so: first, by bringing the question of social conflict, integral to the concept of capitalism, into European integration history; second, by better conceptualizing the link between European governance, Europeanization and the globalization of capitalism; and thirdly by investigating the economic, political and ideological models or doctrines that underlie European cooperation, integration, policies and institutions. Finally, the introduction addresses the question of the analytical benefits of an encounter between capitalism and European integration history, focusing on the case of the 1970s. This allows us to qualify the idea of a clear-cut rupture, and better highlight how the shift of these years resulted from a complex bargaining that took place in part at the European level.

AB - This introduction outlines the possibilities and perspectives of an intertwining between European integration history and the history of capitalism. Although debates on capitalism have been making a comeback since the 2008 crisis, to date the concept of capitalism remains almost completely avoided by historians of European integration. This introduction thus conceptualizes ‘capitalism’ as a useful analytical tool that should be used by historians of European integration and proposes three major approaches for them to do so: first, by bringing the question of social conflict, integral to the concept of capitalism, into European integration history; second, by better conceptualizing the link between European governance, Europeanization and the globalization of capitalism; and thirdly by investigating the economic, political and ideological models or doctrines that underlie European cooperation, integration, policies and institutions. Finally, the introduction addresses the question of the analytical benefits of an encounter between capitalism and European integration history, focusing on the case of the 1970s. This allows us to qualify the idea of a clear-cut rupture, and better highlight how the shift of these years resulted from a complex bargaining that took place in part at the European level.

U2 - 10.1080/13507486.2019.1610361

DO - 10.1080/13507486.2019.1610361

M3 - Journal article

VL - 26

SP - 553

EP - 572

JO - European Review of History/Revue Europeenne d'Histoire

JF - European Review of History/Revue Europeenne d'Histoire

SN - 1350-7486

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 226910929