The Many-Faced Court: The Value of Participation in Annulment Proceedings

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Standard

The Many-Faced Court: The Value of Participation in Annulment Proceedings. / Krajewski, Michal Andrzej.

In: European Constitutional Law Review, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2019, p. 220-246.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Krajewski, MA 2019, 'The Many-Faced Court: The Value of Participation in Annulment Proceedings', European Constitutional Law Review, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 220-246. <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-constitutional-law-review/article/manyfaced-court-the-value-of-participation-in-annulment-proceedings/DB93D0A2AC8676DA97D383C03E7A16CE>

APA

Krajewski, M. A. (2019). The Many-Faced Court: The Value of Participation in Annulment Proceedings. European Constitutional Law Review, 15(2), 220-246. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-constitutional-law-review/article/manyfaced-court-the-value-of-participation-in-annulment-proceedings/DB93D0A2AC8676DA97D383C03E7A16CE

Vancouver

Krajewski MA. The Many-Faced Court: The Value of Participation in Annulment Proceedings. European Constitutional Law Review. 2019;15(2):220-246.

Author

Krajewski, Michal Andrzej. / The Many-Faced Court: The Value of Participation in Annulment Proceedings. In: European Constitutional Law Review. 2019 ; Vol. 15, No. 2. pp. 220-246.

Bibtex

@article{5717e9dcc19242f18f7e926567d9e13d,
title = "The Many-Faced Court: The Value of Participation in Annulment Proceedings",
abstract = "Reporting about their activities, the EU Courts attach great importance to the efficiency of judicial proceedings. Little is known however about how they strive at efficiency in practice; especially, how they strike a balance between procedural economy and the right of the parties to meaningful participation in judicial proceedings. Relying on empirical data, this article explores the rules of procedure and judicial practices relating to annulment proceedings brought by private applicants. It argues that following recent efficiency-oriented procedural reforms, the parties still enjoy broad opportunities for participation in the first instance annulment proceedings before the General Court, whereas the significance of party participation decreases when it comes to the appellate proceedings before the Court of Justice. Be that as it may, the EU judges have instruments to decide, in a fairly autonomously way, on the shape of EU judicial proceedings. The issue of procedural rights before the EU Courts, due to its close link to judicial legitimacy, should be further monitored.",
keywords = "Faculty of Law, European Court of Justice, General Court, EU procedural law, procedural rights, participation, legitimacy, judicial decision making, fair trial, process values, procedural justice, procedural fairness, oral hearings",
author = "Krajewski, {Michal Andrzej}",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "220--246",
journal = "European Constitutional Law Review",
issn = "1574-0196",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Many-Faced Court: The Value of Participation in Annulment Proceedings

AU - Krajewski, Michal Andrzej

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Reporting about their activities, the EU Courts attach great importance to the efficiency of judicial proceedings. Little is known however about how they strive at efficiency in practice; especially, how they strike a balance between procedural economy and the right of the parties to meaningful participation in judicial proceedings. Relying on empirical data, this article explores the rules of procedure and judicial practices relating to annulment proceedings brought by private applicants. It argues that following recent efficiency-oriented procedural reforms, the parties still enjoy broad opportunities for participation in the first instance annulment proceedings before the General Court, whereas the significance of party participation decreases when it comes to the appellate proceedings before the Court of Justice. Be that as it may, the EU judges have instruments to decide, in a fairly autonomously way, on the shape of EU judicial proceedings. The issue of procedural rights before the EU Courts, due to its close link to judicial legitimacy, should be further monitored.

AB - Reporting about their activities, the EU Courts attach great importance to the efficiency of judicial proceedings. Little is known however about how they strive at efficiency in practice; especially, how they strike a balance between procedural economy and the right of the parties to meaningful participation in judicial proceedings. Relying on empirical data, this article explores the rules of procedure and judicial practices relating to annulment proceedings brought by private applicants. It argues that following recent efficiency-oriented procedural reforms, the parties still enjoy broad opportunities for participation in the first instance annulment proceedings before the General Court, whereas the significance of party participation decreases when it comes to the appellate proceedings before the Court of Justice. Be that as it may, the EU judges have instruments to decide, in a fairly autonomously way, on the shape of EU judicial proceedings. The issue of procedural rights before the EU Courts, due to its close link to judicial legitimacy, should be further monitored.

KW - Faculty of Law

KW - European Court of Justice

KW - General Court

KW - EU procedural law

KW - procedural rights

KW - participation

KW - legitimacy

KW - judicial decision making

KW - fair trial

KW - process values

KW - procedural justice

KW - procedural fairness

KW - oral hearings

M3 - Journal article

VL - 15

SP - 220

EP - 246

JO - European Constitutional Law Review

JF - European Constitutional Law Review

SN - 1574-0196

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 238859785